Hyperping vs. New Relic

The New Relic alternative for teams that only needed server monitoring

New Relic's free tier is real: 100 GB of ingest and one full platform user, forever. The second engineer who needs that platform costs $549/month at list. Hyperping Pro is $74/month with 20 server agents, 5 seats, and CPU, memory, filesystem, disk I/O and network metrics from every host.

Migrate from New Relic

14 days free trial — No card required

Move from

New Relic

Move to

MonitoringOn-callStatus pages

Trusted by companies of all sizes and industries

Case study

Quote

Side-by-side comparison

The free tier is generous. The seats are where it lands.

New Relic is a full observability platform: APM, distributed tracing, logs, NRQL, browser and mobile. If what you actually needed was CPU, memory, disk and network from twenty boxes, plus a page when one stops reporting, here is what each setup costs and where the two genuinely differ.

4 engineers · 20 servers · billed annually

Keep $2,122 in your budget every month.

Four people who need to read host metrics, change alert thresholds and acknowledge pages are four full platform users on New Relic. On Hyperping Pro they are four of the five seats already included.

About 97% less than four New Relic full platform users at list

Hyperping Pro$74/mo20 server agents · 100 monitors · 3 status pages · on-call · 5 seats

New Relic$2,196/mo4 full platform users at $549 list, before data ingest

Compare plansAnnual pricing · list prices as of 2026

Pricing, seats and coverage

Pricing modelHow the invoice is built each month

Flat planServers, monitors and seats included up to the plan limits

Users + ingestPer user, plus per GB ingested, or Compute (CCU) units

Four-person infra teamEveryone who needs to read metrics and change alerting

$74/mo5 seats included

$2,196/mo$1,396/mo at the committed $349 rate

Team seatsPeople who can configure hosts, alerts and dashboards

5 includedThen $9/seat on Pro

$549/userCore users are $49/mo with restricted access

Servers includedHosts reporting metrics on the base plan

20 agentsThen $2/mo per extra server

Unlimited hostsBilled on the data those hosts send

Data ingestWhat you pay for the metrics themselves

IncludedNo per-GB line on the invoice

$0.35/GBFree to 100 GB/mo, then $0.35/GB, or $0.55/GB on Data Plus

Time to first host metricFrom signup to a chart with real numbers on it

One commandcurl installer, 30 second scrape, roughly 50 MB RSS

Guided installInfrastructure agent plus the integrations you need

Customer-facing status pageTell users about the incident while you fix the host

3 pages on Pro, custom domains included

No status page product

Metric threshold and anomaly alert conditionsPage when CPU stays above 90% for five minutes

Server alerting fires on liveness: stale, then offline

NRQL alert conditions on any metric, with baselines

Windows serversHost metrics from Windows hosts

Linux with systemd and macOS with launchd only

Windows agent available

Per-process, per-container and swap metricsDrilling below the host into what is using the box

Host-level metrics only, no process or container breakdown

Process, container and Kubernetes visibility

APM, distributed tracing and logsCode-level spans, log search and query language

Monitoring, server metrics, status pages and on-call only

The reason most teams bought New Relic

What both platforms collect from a server

CPU, memory, filesystem and network metrics per host

Disk I/O read and write bytes per block device

One-line agent install on Linux and macOS

amd64 and arm64 agents

Host dashboards with historical charts

Alert when a server stops reporting

Uptime and HTTP checks alongside host metrics

Slack, PagerDuty and webhook notifications

Hyperping's reputation in our company is that it's more reactive than Datadog. We usually get notifications from Hyperping before Datadog.

Read the Alma case study

Fabrice GregoireSite Reliability Engineer, Alma

Why teams choose Hyperping

More than an uptime checker.

One focused workflow for detecting issues, reaching the right people, and keeping customers informed.

The free tier is real. The second engineer is not free.

New Relic gives away 100 GB of ingest a month and one full platform user, and for a solo developer that is hard to beat. The bill starts when a colleague needs the same access: full platform users are $549/month at list, or $349/month on an annual pool commitment. Hyperping Pro includes five seats at $74/month total, and further seats are $9/month.

You know the server bill before you send the data

Ingest pricing moves with your traffic, your log verbosity and whatever a teammate turns on during an incident. Hyperping prices server monitoring by host: 20 agents on Pro, then $2/month per extra server, with no per-GB line. Work out your own number with the server monitoring cost calculator.

One agent, installed in a single command

The Hyperping agent is an embedded OpenTelemetry collector that ships CPU, memory, filesystem, disk I/O and network metrics over OTLP every 30 seconds. It uses roughly 50 MB of RSS, has no JVM, and queues to disk at /var/lib/hyperping/queue so a reboot or an ingest outage does not lose data. See install the agent and metrics collected.

Host metrics, uptime checks and the page in one place

When an agent stops reporting, the server goes stale, then offline, and that opens an outage which runs the bound escalation policy exactly like a failed HTTP check. The same account holds your uptime monitors, your on-call schedule and your status page, so the alert and the customer update live next to each other.

Pricing

Where the money actually goes

A straightforward view of what each plan gives your team.

Free tier

New Relic: 100 GB/month of ingest and 1 full platform user, free with no time limit. Beyond 100 GB it is $0.35/GB, or $0.55/GB on Data Plus.

Hyperping: 1 server agent, 20 monitors and 1 status page free, with 2 days of metric history and no server alerting.

For one developer watching one box, New Relic's free tier is the more generous offer and I will not pretend otherwise. The comparison changes at the second seat.

Four engineers, twenty servers

New Relic: four full platform users at $549 list = $2,196/mo, or $1,396/mo at the $349 committed rate, before any ingest above 100 GB. Downgrading two people to $49 core users saves money and takes away most of what they came for.

Hyperping: $74/mo on Pro covers 20 server agents, 100 monitors, 3 status pages, on-call and 5 seats. Extra servers are $2/month, extra seats $9/month.

Smaller setups start at $24/mo on Essentials with 5 agents. Business is $249/mo with 100 agents and 30 days of metric history.

When New Relic is the right call

New Relic wins on APM, distributed tracing, log management, NRQL query power, browser real user monitoring and mobile monitoring. Hyperping does none of those. If your on-call debugging starts with a slow endpoint and ends in a flame graph, or you need to correlate a log line with a trace ID, stay on New Relic and pay for the platform.

It also stays the better answer for one solo developer, for Windows fleets, and for anyone who needs per-process or per-container attribution.

Bottom line

Plenty of teams looking for a New Relic alternative never opened a trace. They installed the infrastructure agent, watched CPU, memory, disk and network, set up a couple of host alerts, and now pay $549/month per person for the parts they use.

That workload is $74/mo on Hyperping with 20 servers, 5 seats and no ingest meter. If you do read traces, New Relic is the better product. If you don't, you are renting one.

ROI calculator

Legacy Stack vs. Hyperping

Stop paying for bloat. Get a unified platform that saves you money and actually works together.

Legacy Stack

Multiple disconnected tools

New Relic (1 full platform user)

$549/mo

Statuspage.io (2 pages)

$348/mo

PagerDuty (10 users)

$210/mo

Total Monthly$1,107

Total Yearly$13,284

+ time spent integrating & context-switching

Save approx. $10,500/year

All-in-one monitoring platform

1000 monitors

Unlimited status pages

15 team members

On-call & incident response

SAML SSO

Priority support

Total Monthly$249

Total Yearly$2,990

Faster monitoring, simpler workflow.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The practical details teams usually want to know before making the switch.

How much does New Relic cost for a team of 4?

Is New Relic's free tier really free?

What server metrics does Hyperping collect?

Can Hyperping replace New Relic APM?

Does Hyperping monitor Windows servers?

How long does it take to move server monitoring off New Relic?

A safer switch

Start migrating in minutes. Cut over when you are ready.

Move from New Relic without creating a blind spot. The guides below cover setup, parallel verification, and the final cutover.

Monitoring quickstart

Step 1

Inventory your New Relic setup

List checks, alert routes, status pages, and the historical reports you want to keep.

Use the monitoring quickstart

Step 2

Recreate monitoring and alerting

Add monitors, connect notification channels, and rebuild escalation or on-call rules.

Follow the quickstart

Step 3

Run both tools, then cut over

Compare alerts in parallel, verify customer communication, and only then retire the old setup.

Open the go-live checklist

Keep comparing

Hyperping vs. other tools

See the same feature-by-feature breakdown for the monitoring and incident tools on your shortlist.

ComparisonNetdata alternative ComparisonPingdom alternative ComparisonUptimeRobot alternative

Get started

Start monitoring in the next 5 minutes.

Stop letting customers discover your outages first. Set up monitoring, status pages, on-call, and alerts before your next coffee break.

Talk to sales

14 days free trial. No card required.