Post-mortem (incident review)

A post-mortem is a written review of an incident after it is resolved: what happened, why, how the team responded, and what will change so it doesn't happen again. It is also called an incident review or a retrospective.

Hyperping public post-mortem editor with summary, root cause, resolution, and what we are changing sections

Hyperping supports two kinds of post-mortem. The internal one is written on the incident itself, under Incident Management, and stays in the dashboard for your team. The public one is attached to a status page incident once it's resolved and appears at the top of it, above the updates posted during the outage, so customers asking "what happened yesterday?" get one link.

Post-mortem structure

  • A summary in two or three sentences: what broke, for whom, and for how long.
  • The impact, with numbers: duration, share of users or requests affected, data lost if any.
  • A timeline in UTC, from the first sign of trouble to full recovery, including when it was detected and acknowledged.
  • The root cause and the contributing factors. There is usually more than one.
  • What went well and what didn't during the response.
  • Action items, each with one owner and a due date.

The post-mortem template has these sections ready to fill in.

Writing a useful post-mortem

  • Write it within a few days, while people remember the details and the logs are still there.
  • Keep it blameless. Describe what people did and why it made sense with what they knew, and look for the system changes that would have prevented it. See blameless postmortem.
  • Ask "why" until you reach something you can change. "The engineer ran the wrong command" isn't a root cause. "The command runs against production by default" is.
  • Keep the action items few and real. Three done beat ten that sit in a backlog.
  • Follow up. A post-mortem whose actions never ship will be rewritten for the same incident later.

Internal vs public post-mortems

The internal version is for engineers and includes everything: names in the timeline, internal systems, the commands that were run. The public version is for customers: what happened in plain words, how they were affected, and what you changed. Skip internal names and blame, apologize once, and be specific about the fix. A public post-mortem also helps with security reviews and enterprise buyers, who want to see how you handle incidents.

FAQ

When should you write a post-mortem?

For every SEV1 and SEV2 incident, for any data loss, and for any incident customers noticed. Also for near-misses that could have been serious.

Who writes the post-mortem?

Usually the incident lead or the on-call engineer who handled it, with input from everyone involved. The whole team reviews it together.

What is the difference between a post-mortem and a root cause analysis?

A root cause analysis is one section of the post-mortem. The post-mortem also covers the impact, the timeline, the response, and the follow-up actions.

Related Terms

Blameless Postmortem
An incident review process that focuses on systemic improvements rather than individual fault.
MTTR (mean time to recovery)
MTTR, or mean time to recovery, is the average time it takes to restore a service after a failure. D...
Incident severity
Incident severity is a level, such as SEV1 to SEV4 or critical, major, and minor, that ranks an inci...
Status page
A status page is a web page where a company shows whether its services are working, posts updates du...

Related Resources

Get started

Start monitoring in the next 5 minutes.

Stop letting customers discover your outages first. Set up monitoring, status pages, on-call, and alerts before your next coffee break.

Free plan, 20 monitors. No credit card, no time limit.